A 2,800-test suite burns 90 hours a release when regression is manual.
Watch an automated suite lap yours in 28 seconds — below.
Make every number on this page yours
Set your team's reality — the demo, the race, the chart, and the ROI below all recalculate live.
Where the hours actually go
A single manual regression cycle, step by step.
-
01
Write & maintain test cases
Specs drift, cases rot. Someone reconciles them by hand.
~5.9 hrs / release -
02
Execute manually
Click, type, compare, repeat — 500 cases, one pair of eyes at a time.
~7.9 hrs -
03
Log & triage bugs
Reproduce, screenshot, write steps, file, argue severity.
~1.8 hrs -
04
Regression re-test
Every fix risks a new break. Re-run the affected areas. Again.
~2.3 hrs
Total: 18 hrs per release · 72 hrs per month
Same suite. Same clock. Different century.
One regression cycle, manual vs automated — the automated lane keeps lapping.
press play — or just scroll, it starts itself
Testing that lives inside the pipeline
Scroll to walk the pipeline.
Testing triggers on every push — not on a test plan someone has to remember to run.
The artifact that gets tested is the artifact that ships. No "it worked in staging."
500 tests, run in parallel, on every build. A failure blocks the merge — with a trace, screenshots, and the exact commit attached.
Release day becomes a merge, not a weekend. 47% of teams postpone releases over manual-testing bottlenecks — this is the fix.
Where automation pays first
Tap a card — manual time vs automated time for the same coverage.
The honest chart: automation isn't free
Upfront scripting costs real weeks. Maintenance runs 10–20% ongoing — we model the top of that range. Here's when it pays back anyway, with your numbers.
Your annual number
Pre-filled from your inputs above. Deliberately conservative: only 80% of cases are worth automating, scripting costs 45 minutes per automated case up front, and a 20% ongoing maintenance tax comes off the top — real numbers survive procurement.
In the 0 seconds you've been on this page, a manual tester finished 0 test cases. An automated suite ran 0.
Who builds this
Cale Maynard — Senior Automation Engineer, 10+ years in regulated government and enterprise SaaS QA.
- 5,000+ automated tests authored
- 35% faster regression after leading a Selenium → Playwright migration
- 1,200+ tests in a single production suite
- SQL-level validation — the data behind the UI, not just the pixels
- AI-powered agentic pipelines (GitHub Actions · Cloudflare · Claude)
This page is itself the demo: vanilla JS, zero dependencies, no tracking, loads in under a second. View source.
That's — hours back, every year.
One conversation to find out what your suite would take.
Get your hours back